A special City Council meeting held Thursday ahead of Mayor Todd Gloria’s State of the City address was dominated by impassioned public testimony, with residents raising alarms about immigration enforcement, the city’s budget deficit, and public safety.

 

SAN DIEGO – Tensions were high at City Hall on Thursday, January 15, as dozens of citizens took the opportunity to address the City Council during a special session. While convened to hear Mayor Todd Gloria’s 2026 State of the City address, the public comment period revealed deep-seated anxieties within the community, particularly regarding the actions of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

Several speakers voiced terror over rumored ICE operations in the coming weeks, citing recent violent incidents elsewhere and demanding protection from the city. They called for concrete action beyond simple statements. “Words aren’t going to help us,” declared Nancy Francis, a District 3 resident. “We don’t want anybody in our community to be shot in the face three times... We need action.”

The sentiment was echoed by others who fear family separations and violence. Activists urged the San Diego Police Department to refrain from cooperating with federal agents and called on the mayor to stand with the community. “We need real directives to the San Diego Police Department to either show up and protect the community... or don’t show up and do not give them cover to hurt us,” one speaker passionately stated. On the side of Enforcement “ their names and remember the victims of collateral damage of SB 54, Samara Mora Gutierrez, Samantha Mora Gutierrez, Samia Mora Gutierrez, Oscar Omar Hernandez, and especially Aria Cruz Asensio and Aiden Antonio Torres de Paz. Those last two were killed in San Diego at the hands of illegal immigrants. Start an illegal immigrant defense fund to protect victims. They should not have to resort to GoFundMes for restitution. There’s collateral damage for sanctuary policies. Protect all San Diegans, including the children. Thank you.”

Beyond immigration, residents sharply criticized the city’s financial management. Catherine Douglas pointed to the “$105 million budget deficit” and failing infrastructure as evidence of broken public trust, which she argued was the reason a proposed sales tax increase failed. Concerns were also raised about the housing crisis, homelessness, and controversial issues like the Torrey Pines Gliderport lease and the use of Flock surveillance technology.

While the majority of comments were critical, a few speakers shared positive experiences, thanking the city for assistance with housing and social services. However, the overwhelming tone was one of urgency and a demand for accountability from their elected officials.

As the council prepared to hear the mayor’s vision for the year ahead, the preceding public testimony served as a powerful and raw reminder of the pressing challenges and fears weighing on the minds of many San Diegans. The community’s message was clear: they are looking for more than just a speech; they are demanding decisive leadership and tangible solutions.

AI WROTE FROM AUDIO

EMAIL : [email protected]

@619CVLD

For ANY Corrections

CHULA VISTA, CA – The city is intensifying its enforcement of municipal codes, with a particular focus on the illegal long-term parking of recreational vehicles (RVs) on residential properties, unpermitted land grading, and the use of storage containers. Recent public meetings have highlighted the delicate balance officials must strike between enforcing safety and environmental standards and addressing the practical challenges faced by residents amid a regional housing crisis.

A primary point of contention is the use of RVs as semi-permanent dwellings. While acknowledging the housing crunch, city code enforcement remains firm: using an RV as a primary residence on a residential lot is a violation due to safety concerns, such as fire risks from improper electrical hookups. The rules also target the proliferation of "makeshift RV parks" in residential backyards. Following heated debate, the Planning Commission recently adopted a rule limiting RV occupation on private property to seven consecutive days. "We are talking about backyards with three, four, or even six RVs in very poor condition, which poses real safety problems," one commissioner noted, explaining the goal is to give code enforcement the tools to act on complaints about abusive situations.

Another major issue discussed is unpermitted land grading. Officials clarified that while fines for building code infractions range from $100 to $500, penalties for grading violations can reach up to $25,000 per day. Deputy Director for Development Services, Rebecca Bridgeford, explained the high fines are a tool to compel immediate action on large-scale violations with significant environmental impact. "If you're talking about 250,000 cubic yards, you're talking about 7,000 school buses full of dirt," she stated. However, she assured that for property owners who cooperate to get the proper permits, these large fines are typically "washed away."

The city is also grappling with the growing use of shipping containers and other portable storage units in residential areas outside of active construction projects, which some view as a visual nuisance. At the same time, officials debated fees for nonprofits, with some arguing for a more collaborative approach to avoid hindering the work of community-based organizations like the South Bay Pioneers, a sober living facility provider.

As Chula Vista continues to grow, these discussions underscore the city's ongoing challenge: how to update its regulations to address modern problems while remaining flexible to the needs of its residents. The recent decisions signal a move toward stricter enforcement, but the dialogue between the city and its community remains crucial in navigating the line between regulation and reality.

SAN DIEGO – The Port of San Diego is navigating a series of contentious debates over the financial agreements that reimburse its five member cities for public services. Commissioners are calling for a standardized, transparent methodology, as recent discussions over contracts with Imperial Beach have revealed "wildly different" and inconsistent formulas for calculating costs for police and fire protection on Port Tidelands.

During a review of the Municipal Services Agreement (MSA) with Imperial Beach, commissioners voiced frustration over the lack of a unified standard. Each city—San Diego, National City, Chula Vista, Coronado, and Imperial Beach—currently uses a unique formula, making it difficult for the Port to verify costs and ensure fair reimbursement. Some cities are paid based on calls for service, while others include "proactive policing" or use complex "backup models" to justify higher costs.

The core of the debate with Imperial Beach centers on a unique clause that includes a three-block inland zone in the service area. This practice is based on the theory that many public safety incidents in this area are a "spillover" from activity originating on the Port-managed beaches. This has raised legal questions, as the Port is essentially paying for services on land it does not control. Port counsel justified the practice by arguing a direct "nexus" exists, as the need for services "arises due to the tidelands." However, some commissioners warned this could set a costly precedent if other cities demanded similar terms. "If this were applied to other cities, get ready for a significant budget challenge at the port," one commissioner noted.

While acknowledging the unique needs of each city, several commissioners stressed the need for reform. "We're here attempting to make a fair reimbursement... It's our duty to ensure that we're paying a fair price," stated one board member.

The push for consistency comes as the Port also moves to streamline development on another front. It recently approved updates to the Chula Vista Bayfront Master Plan to simplify construction phases by aligning transportation mitigation measures with the actual pace of development, a move aimed at accelerating the project.

These financial and logistical adjustments highlight the complex partnerships between the Port and its member cities. As the Port seeks a more equitable and efficient system for managing its responsibilities, the challenge will be to create a clear framework that serves the public interest without creating unintended financial burdens.

AI WROTE FROM AUDIO

EMAIL : [email protected]

@619CVLD

For ANY Corrections